How do seating arrangements affect learning/what is the best seating arrangement?

How do seating arrangements affect learning/what is the best seating arrangement?

 

The seating arrangements of a classroom have an effect on where students focus their attention.  To use a non-teaching example imagine you are out on a date the traditional dinner and a movie. Which part of the date do you expect to interact with your date more? Well hopefully over the dinner where you can look directly at your partner and read their body language. In the movie theater the majority of our focus will be on the big screen.

To take our metaphor back to the classroom the movie theater is a standard classroom with the traditional seating arrangement i.e. nice straight rows. Instead of the focus being on a movie however the focus is on the teacher. This environment encourages a teacher centered style of teaching. The teacher delivers the material occasionally throwing out comprehension questions to the class by either calling on a random student or by throwing out a question to the class like a beach ball.  In my experience this method has a couple of drawbacks. First Korean students are nervous and do not enjoy responding in this manner as they are afraid that they will make a mistake and look stupid in front of the entire class. Second in a class of 20 students only 2 voices active at one time (and often one of those voices is the teacher) leaving the other students unengaged.

This standard classroom is not the best environment for teaching students a language for a variety of reasons. The most important has to be that language is by its nature communicative it requires interaction with another individual to exist. The traditional classroom environment also has a tendency to change students into “listening objects” engagement levels are very low and the students (especially at the back of the classroom) can tune out.

If as a teacher we are trying to encourage active participation and use of the language we need to change the classroom environment so that it encourages this. The easiest way to do this is to go back to our date model. During the dinner section (where most conversation occurs) the students are facing each other and focused inward on the task at hand. We don’t always have to work in pairs in fact groups of four students working together on the task is the optimum size with a small space between them and the next group. The teacher then floats between the groups giving support where it is needed.

In this seating arrangement the students are more engaged because they are interacting directly with their peers in a small group setting.  If students do make a mistake the embarrassment is limited to a small group of friends who have also been making mistakes. This group model also effectively increases the number of students who can speak at any one time.

 

The group of four also allows the teacher to make use of jigsaw activities. These are where the students leave their home groups and join a new team to discuss or share what their team created.

 

 

One of the best ways to change student behavior is to change the environment to support the behavior you are looking for. If you are looking for a more interactive classroom with a higher proportion of student engagement the small group classroom model can provide a great deal of support.

Some teachers do not have the luxury of movable desks or seats and so have settled for the traditional layout.  There are ways to get your students into groups even in these circumstances you must shape the classroom to how you want to teach please don’t allow it to shape you.

Share

Teachers belief in students.

I’m currently reading a very interesting book entitled

Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior

It’s full of great insights into the way we think and behave but it can also be highly disturbing from the point of view of an educator. One thing that is particularly disturbing is dubbed the chameleon effect. To summarize one of the studies it was found that when instructors were given a rating of the potential of a student before the class began even though it was a randomly generated number the students with higher scores did better in the final exams.

The teachers impression of the student translated into higher scores for students who had bee given a higher random number and lower scores for students with lower generated numbers.

the authors note that.

We’re constantly sending and receiving cues and subtle messages to and from one another — swaying and being swayed, even if our rational brain hasn’t been let in on the secret. As this study illustrates, we can’t help but take on the characteristics others ascribe to us.

So what are the implications for this in a classroom? Well first we should ask ourselves what characteristics are we ascribing to our students?

Our view of students will directly influence their behavior so are we ascribing positive markers or negative?

How many self-fulfilling classrooms have we established?

More importantly what can we do about it?

One thing we can do is stop the negativity before it starts. Comments about how bad a certain type of student is only sets up your colleagues to have the same view as you. Before you go into the classroom put yourself in a positive frame of mind remind yourself that your students are intelligent lively energetic human beings and if you view them as such they will respond to it and you can work the chameleon effect to your advantage.

I work in English language teaching and I have a little mantra “Lacking of English skill is not the same as Lacking Intelligence”.  I remind myself daily that skills can be acquired and that I am constantly learning new skills myself. I will always believe my students can succeed and surprise me with the growth in their ability. I also believe that every student has a desire to communicate and use language my job is to encourage that desire.

Oddly enough these beliefs have been borne out by my students and by my classes.

I’d like to leave with a question.

The truly great teachers in the world are the ones who reach students no one else can. Are they truly great because they can reach this person or do they just believe that the person wants to be reached?

Share

Help Hack Autisim

I dream of a world where we can get the technology to help a student with special needs into their hands. It’s a place where technology is developed to help everyone express themselves. Even if they don’t think in precisely the same way as the majority of people.

Thankfully this is a dream that I share with some people who can make it a reality.

 

a group of engineers and education specialists collaborating to create new ways of reaching the students that have traditionally been unreachable. Do what you can to support them I know I will.

 

http://hackingautism.org/

Share

Lighting

I remember getting killer headaches in school. We had these floursecent light bulbs that would hum just inside my range of hearing. The light itself would make me sick at times too. finally a school in surrey is setting out to study the effect of lighting on the school environment and learning.

read more here

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/01/mood-lighting-boost-academic-performance

I’ll be very interested in seeing the results.

 

Peadar

Share

Poem

I found this Poem at the back of Carol Ann Tomlinson’s and Marcia B. Imbeau’s “leading and managing a differentiated classroom” (expect a full book review in the future)

Yes, But….

I teach in a four-wall box of drab proportions,

but choose to make it a place that feels like home.

I see too many students to know them as they need to be known,

But refuse to let that render them faceless in my mind.

I am overcome with the transmission of a cannon I can scarcely recall myself,

But will not represent learning as a burden to the young.

I suffer from a poverty of time,

And so will use what I have to best advantage those I teach.

I am an echo of the way school has been since forever,

But will not agree to perpetuate the echo for another generation.

I am told I am as good a teacher as the test scores I generate,

But will not allow my students to see themselves as data.

I work in isolation,

And am all the more determined to connect my students with the world.

I am small in the chain of power,

But have the power to change young lives.

there are many reasons to succumb,

And thirty reasons five times a day to succeed.

Most decisions about my job are removed from me ,

Except the ones that matter most.

 

I’m unsure of the author but the sentiment should be burned into the heart of every teacher. When I find myself struggling and frustrated I find it calms me and helps me to regain my balance.

My thanks to the poet for catching so beautifully the struggles and triumphs of teaching.

 

Share